RAD 140 and LGD 4033 are well known Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) that are proven to be effective for increasing muscle mass.
They have a lot in common, such as the ability to pass through cell membranes and interact with the body’s androgen receptors, but RAD 140 has a few distinctive advantages over LGD 4033 when it comes to bulking up.
For example, medical research shows that RAD 140 has a much higher binding affinity than LGD 4033, meaning it is more effective at activating the androgen receptors.
Furthermore, many reviews report that you can see an increase in muscle growth just weeks after cycling with RAD 140 while the same results may take months with LGD 4033.
With all these factors taken into consideration, if your goal is building muscle then why not opt for the SARM that delivers fast results RAD 140!
RAD 140 (Testostelone)
Testolone (RAD140) is a modern and potent SARM with an outstanding anabolic to androgenic ratio of 90:1. While no human trials on this compound have been published yet, an animal study found it to be effective in treating female patients with breast cancer.
Even at a very low dosage, researchers were able to observe the substantial results that Testolone produces; its potential cannot be understated.
As such, Testolone is highly sought after on the professional bodybuilding market and promises to bring great results for those looking to build strength and muscle mass without the adverse side effects typically associated with harsh steroids.
LGD 4033 (Ligandrol)
LGD 4033, more commonly known as Ligandrol, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM) which has proved effective even at very low dosages.
Human trials with LGD 4033 have yielded amazing results subjects have tolerated a dose of up to 22mgs per day without issue.
It has well-documented anabolic properties and its potential to aid in muscle growth has cemented the place of Ligandrol among the most promising SARMs on the market today.
With progression into phase II trials, Ligandrol is quickly becoming one of the most popular and widely used SARMs its immense potential makes it an exciting candidate for future medical applications.
Half-Life of RAD 140 vs. LGD 4033
Recent studies on RAD 140 and Ligandrol indicate an interesting difference in their respective half-lives.
According to the research, RAD 140 has a half-life of sixty hours, meaning it takes two and a half days for its concentration in the blood to drop below 50%.
In contrast, yLigandrol’s half-life falls between 24 and 36 hours; meaning users only have to take these SARMs once a day during their cycle.
These findings provide useful information to those considering these substances for problem areas or physical performance improvement.
Despite this distinct difference between the two, both are worth researching further as they each provide potential solutions with fewer side effects than traditional anabolic therapies.
RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 Benefits Compared
LGD 4033 and RAD 140 are two SARMs that share important characteristics.
LGD 4033 has a molar mass of 338.25 g/mol and is most suitable for a dry, consistent increase in muscle mass, while RAD 140’s molar mass of 393.8 g/mol is better for rapidly gaining significant muscle weight.
Neither carries a large risk of hormone suppression, but RAD 140 appears to have more moderate effects in this area.
These SARMs have been popular among serious athletes and bodybuilders due to their inexpensive cost compared to other performance enhancers and the fact that they require few injections per cycle; the average cost for LGD 4033 varies from $45 to $50 per ml, while RAD 140 typically costs $55 to $70 per ml.
Side Effect Comparison
RAD140 has been noted to have a higher androgenic activity than LGD4033, making it more likely that certain side effects may occur during use.
These can include hair loss, deepening of the voice, and possible enlargement of the prostate. In contrast, Ligandrol is not known to exert as much androgenic activity on users and side effects are reportedly rarer.
While these conclusions are based on research studies, it is advised that potential users should consume RAD140 or LGD4033 according to doses that have been established in clinical trials and approved by medical professionals.
Which is Better For Lean Body Mass
For those looking to increase muscle mass and gain a lean, dry physiqe without much residual water retention, Ligandrol is the clear choice.
Unlike other anabolic agents, users report steady, reliable gains within 12 weeks of cycling Ligandrol.
This makes it favourable for those who wish to take advantage of its performance-enhancing effects without extreme water retention common in many other supplements, allowing for longer periods of use and increased recovery time.
Alternatively, if one’s only goal is to build maximum size within a short period of time, RAD140 may be preferred as it produces faster results.
RAD 140 VS LGD 4033 – Results
When it comes to building muscle strength, RAD 140 is the way to go. Thanks to its greater power and pumps in the gym, you can build up your strength quickly.
On the other hand, if you’re looking for extra gains, Ligandrol is ideal.
This compound offers an additional push that can take your workout regimen to the next level while decreasing your recovery times between sessions.
By understanding both substances and their benefits, you can enhance your performance even further.
Conclusion
For those looking to gain lean muscle mass and reduce their recovery times, Ligandrol is a great option.
More commonly known as LGD-4033, it helps maximize results with minimal side effects, allowing you to train more intensely without worrying about the repercussions.
For those seeking a ripped physique with low body fat and visible muscle definition, RAD 140 is what you need.
It’s designed to optimize your growth while maintaining safe levels of testosterone in the body, reducing the need for post-cycle therapy after use.
Whether you choose Ligandrol or RAD 140, always make sure to use them in low doses in order to reap the full benefits without any adverse effects.
